Land Warfare

One lawmaker wants to force the Navy’s hand on emergency sealift capacity

Congress has long been irritated by the Navy’s pace for sealift recap. One lawmaker says he’s ready to shake things up.

Rep. Rob Wittman Visits Afghans on Task Force Quantico
Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., meets Brig. Gen. Forrest Poole (right) on Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Scott Jenkins)

Updated 10/14/2022 at 1:35 pm ET with comments from the US Navy.

AUSA 2022 — How do you break up a longstanding dispute between the US Army and US Navy? Call in the Maritime Administration, of course.

That’s effectively what one influential Navy-oriented lawmaker says it may take to finally break an impasse between the two services over who should lead a more aggressive recapitalization of the country’s surge sealift capabilities.

“We’ve seen that we’ve given the Navy the permission to buy these used roll-on/roll-off ships,” Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., told an Oct. 11 audience at the annual AUSA exposition in Washington, DC. “I think being able to use a [legislative] provision or the Maritime Administration is great way to go. They [MARAD] are in a position to be able… to purchase those ships.”

The impasse is one filled with Pentagon bureaucracy and intra-service fighting over who should foot the bill for assets all the services will use. It centers around the surge sealift fleet, the civilian-manned vessels responsible for moving ground supplies from the continental United States to anywhere in the world if a conflict breaks out. That fleet desperately requires aggressive recapitalization, and lawmakers such as Wittman have authorized and appropriated millions in recent years to allow the Navy to purchase new vessels.

The problem is that the Navy has failed to purchase or build ships at a rate that satisfies Congress. Service officials, for their part, have defended their record at congressional hearings by citing the ships that have been purchased and discussed the market surveys conducted by the Maritime Administration. But still, Wittman says, those efforts have been “incredibly delayed.”

Lt. Meagan Morrison, a Navy spokeswoman, on Friday told Breaking Defense, “The Navy is committed to sealift recapitalization in the most efficient and effective manner possible.”

“We are grateful for continued Congressional support for the ‘buy-used’ program and successfully purchased the first two ships in 2022, which will join the Ready Reserve Fleet before the end of the year. We are working hard to procure the next five appropriated by Congress,” she continued.

Some in Congress have argued the other branches of the Pentagon should help the Navy foot the bill for recapitalizing the fleet because all the services will ultimately want to load those ships up with materials if and when a fight happens.

The Army — which would likely be the biggest beneficiary of a scenario where the surge sealift is needed —  has been hesitant to get in front of the Navy on procuring those ships because it puts them at risk of footing much of the bill, Wittman said.

“What we have to do is to, I think, look at different mechanisms to execute that” recapitalization, Wittman said. “MARAD… is probably the direction to go because we’ve seen the Navy just isn’t interested in executing.”

The Maritime Administration, or MARAD, is the civilian shipping arm of the federal government and is officially part of the Transportation Department. The agency is also responsible for maintaining and operating the logistics vessels that the Navy would have to rely on in wartime to move vast amounts of ground supplies needed by both the Army and Marine Corps.

MARAD in conjunction with US Transportation Command have been assisting the Navy in planning and procuring the future surge sealift fleet. However, the money ultimately goes into the Navy’s coffers and must be spent accordingly.

But if Wittman, who alongside Rep. Joe Courtney, D-Conn. has long led the House panel officially charged with overseeing US Navy policy, has the last word, the civilian agency may have greater leverage in the process.

Although Courtney was not at the panel on Tuesday, he has expressed similar concerns publicly about the Navy’s pace of recapitalization and, at least on issues regarding the US Navy, is often in sync with Wittman.

“I understand the dynamic” between the Army and Navy when it comes to sealift, Wittman said. “I do think, though, it’s Congress’ role to say [these are] the resources that we’re going to put together and Congress decides how those allocations take place amongst the joint force. Remember, this is a joint responsibility.”

AUSA 2022

AUSA 2022

Over at Rheinmetall's booth sat the hefty Lynx OMFV (Optionally Manned Fighting Vehicle). The company, as its competitors, is hoping to make a strong impression as the Army looks for OMFV proposals later this fall -- the early stage of an almost certainly lucrative long-term contract award. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
All the way from down under, the Australian firm Defendtex presented some of its modular UAVs. Here visitors can see the Drone155, which the company says can be outfitted with ISR payloads or explosives. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
The MVPP from Globe Tech stands for Modular Vehicle Protection Platform, a vehicle add-on that can take the brunt of improvised explosive device detonations. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
AUSA was well attended by international officers and officials as well, and by foreign defense firms. The Korean booth, shown here, featured some products hoping to make a splash in the US military. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
Not your traditional defense contractor, the computing giant IBM has a booth at AUSA showing off its flashy but functional quantum computer. The US government as a whole, and the Pentagon in particular, are heavily invested in the quantum computing race with the likes of China. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
Among the fleet of vehicles parked throughout the AUSA floor for display was the Flyer 72-U, made by General Dynamics. The company says the vehicle takes a "modular approach" so it can be configured for anything from "light strike assault" to rescue and evacuation. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
The stuff of counter-UAS nightmares, the Virginia-based BlueHalo firm makes drone swarms that use AI and machine learning to provide battlefield intelligence to soldiers. The Army's Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office awarded the company $14 million in February to develop the HIVE. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
It's a .50 caliber Gatling gun, one that Dillon Aero says can fire 1,500 shots per minute, or 25 rounds per second. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
For this year's show AM General rolled its own Humvee Saber, Blade Edition, onto the floor. The company claims "leap-ahead" technology for a light tactical vehicle. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
Patria, a defense firm owned jointly by Finland and Norway's Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace, made it's way across the Atlantic for AUSA 2022, bringing along its AMV multi-role vehicle. The AMV was recently purchased by the dozens by Slovakia and its home country of Finland. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
At the Pratt Miller Defense booth, visitors will see a full-sized Expeditionary Modular Autonomous Vehicle (EMAV) is the "newest and perhaps most mobile and lethal" of the company's autonomous offerings. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
Marathon's Autonomous Robot Targets are exactly what that sounds like: shooting targets guided by computer code and designed to "look, move, and even behave like people," the company says. The robots were on the move on the AUSA floor -- though no shooting was allowed. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
The AUSA show floor offered a fresh look at a futuristic version of an old Army standby: the Abrams tank. This one, the Abrams X, is made by General Dynamics Land Systems, manufacturers of the current Abrams M1A1 and M1A2 battle tanks used by the US Army. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
Attendees may walk by model versions of the famous Iron Dome system, in use for years in Israel, and its sister SkyCeptor system, both made by Rafael. The SkyCeptor, in particular, is meant to "defeat short- to medium-range ballistic and cruise missiles and other advanced air defense threats," the company says. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
As the need for counter-UAS systems explodes, Epirus is at AUSA repping its counter-electronics system Stryker Leonidas, made with General Dynamics. The system's "counter-swarm" weapon "fills a pressing short range air defense (SHORAD) capability gap," the company says. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
A new unveiling for AUSA, Rheinmetall announced this week the Mission Master CXT platform, the newest addition to the company's "family" of autonomous ground vehicles. The company says the CXT "combines the power of a diesel engine with a silent electric motor." (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).
The GMC Hummer EV Platform, the first vehicle on GM's New Ultium EV Platform, goes on display at AUSA 2022. All-electric offerings are the center of much of the Army's attention these days as it aims to electrify its non-tactical, and eventually tactical, fleet. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
Two new Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicles (AMPV) sit at the booth by Bae Systems. The vehicles are meant to replace the Army's venerable, but old M113s. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
Palantir shows off its prototype for the Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN) vehicle. The company says the TITAN "will be the critical backbone that provides correlation, fusion, and integration of sensor data alongside insights from AI/ML overlaid at the tactical edge." In other words, it's meant to find the signal in the noise. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
A model of a "modernized" Boeing Apache AH-64E shown Association of US Army Conference in 2022. While the Army is about to choose two new airframes, there's currently no Apache replacement on the horizon. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
Lockheed Martin teamed up with Sikorsky to produce the Raider X, the team's competitor in the Army's Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft (FARA) program, one of two high-profile Army Future Vertical Lift contests currently underway. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
The Bell 360 Invictus is the other FARA competitor, looking to beat out the Lockheed-Sikorsky team. The Army's expected to make its decision in fiscal 2024. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
The defense start-up Anduril has expanded its footprint in the defense market in recent years. This product, the Mobile Sentry, "brings autonomous fixed site counter UAS and counter intrusion capabilities into a mobile form factor," the company says. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith)
The military's no-so-furry friendly robot dogs are back at AUSA this year. This model, called the Vision 60 Q-UGV from Ghost Robotics, is an "all-weather ground robot for use in a broad range of unstructured urban and natural environments for defense, homeland and enterprise applications," the company says. (Breaking Defense/Brendon Smith).