Gen. Hawk CarlisleWe interviewed Gen. Hawk Carlisle, the commander of Pacific Air Forces, at the Air Force Association’s Pacific Forum in Los Angeles, about the challenges facing the U.S. and its allies in shaping a 21st century Pacific defense strategy.

The general emphasized the central role engaging our allies is playing for the Air Force in the Pacific.

“The chief (of staff of the Air Force) has underscored that as resources are constrained we need to become closer with our allies. I would add that we need to do this as well for strategic reasons. Our allies in the Pacific are always in the frontline.  This means that our task is to have credible forward presence for deterrence working in close coordination with those allies.”

Both in his presentation as well as during the interview, the general highlighted the importance of practical steps to enhance allied collaboration. He highlighted in the public presentation the growing role of collaboration among the Pacific allies and the importance of that for U.S. policy as well.

In the interview, he noted that the U.S.-Japanese relationship is undergoing a fundamental transformation. The Japanese are clearly rethinking their defense posture and he argued that the U.S. was working much more deeply and comprehensively with the Japanese defense forces than even two years ago.  For example, “We have moved our air defense headquarters to Yokota Air Base and we are doing much closer coordination on air and missile defense with the Japanese to deal with a wider spectrum of regional threats.”

The Air Force is stepping up its collaborative efforts and capabilities with key regional air forces, including with Australia, Singapore, South Korea and Japan. And Carlisle emphasized that the service is pushing to enhance cross-collaborative capabilities among those allies as well.

While trying to get the allies to work more closely with each other, the Pacific commander also underscored that the US Air Force is adopting allied innovations.

“Singapore is doing very innovative things with their F-15s, notably in evolving the capabilities of the aircraft to contribute to maritime defense and security. We are looking very carefully at their innovations and can leverage their approach and thinking as well,” he said. “This will certainly grow as we introduce the fleet of F-35s in the Pacific where cross national collaboration is built in.”

Forging paths towards cross-domain synergy among joint and coalition forces is a key effort underway.

The general cited several examples.

The US Army and Air Force can better integrate their missile defense capabilities, to expand defensive and offensive performance. During his presentation, Carlisle highlighted the example of a rapid deployment of an Army missile defense battery for the defense of a key Air Force airfield, calling this kind of capability central for now and a building block for the future.

Second, he described the ability of advanced aircraft, in this case the F-22, to provide forward targeting through its sensors for submarine based T-LAMS (cruise missiles) as both a more effective use of the current force and a building block for the emergence of the F-35 fleet in the Pacific.

Third, the Air Force is learning from the Marines about ways to become more expeditionary. A key example he cited is the “Rapid Raptor deployment.” The idea is to take four Raptors and deploy them with a C-17 and to rotate across the Pacific to go to the point of need for implementing missions. This provided both a tool for enhanced survival and an enhanced capability to apply the force associated with a fifth-generation aircraft as well.

His focus was upon leveraging Air Force and joint assets in ways that would make that force more expeditionary and more effective in providing for cross-domain synergy.  He noted that the combination of a large deck carrier with the Air Force with the Amphibious Ready Group and Marine Expeditionary Unit (ARG-MEU) air assets when conjoined within a distributed strike package provides significantly greater capability than when each is considered on its own.

He sees this reshaping approach as central to shaping the distributed operations approach emerging as the F-35 fleet is deployed over the decade ahead.

“The F-35 is the finest sensor-enabled aircraft ever built. The F-35 is orders of magnitude better than the F-22 (which is the greatest air to air fighter ever built) as an electronic warfare enabled sensor-rich aircraft.  We already are working synergy between F-22s and fourth generation aircraft to provide greater fidelity of the information shaping air combat operations. With the F-22 and F-35 combination and the folding in of on-orbit information and surveillance systems, we will be able to generate more synergy across the fleet,” the general told us.

The other advantage of the F-35 is its commonality across the services.  “We are already working on greater synergy among the air power services; with the F-35 and deploying common assets in a dispersed fleet, the efforts we are making now for today’s conditions will only lead to more effective capabilities for tomorrow’s crises as well.”

The general sees the addition of the new Long Range Strike aircraft as informed by the decade ahead in shaping the new approach.

“The new bomber is really a family of long range strike systems.  Taking the approach towards synergy, and accepting your proposition that no platform fights alone, the next-generation bomber really is about making the entire force more lethal and more effective, not simply adding a new platform.”

He underscored that with the addition of the F-35 to the F-22s already deployed in the Pacific, the kind of transformation he envisaged as the new bomber gets folded in during the decade after next will accelerate.

“When you bring Raptor and F-35 into the mix you make every one of the platforms better in terms of its performance for the joint force,” he told us. “And referring back to your concept of S Cubed (Stealth, Sensors, and Speed), when you put those two together with long range strike the synergy unleashed by S Cubed will be significantly enhanced as well.”

 

Comments

  • Don Bacon

    . . . as the F-35 fleet is deployed over the decade ahead.

    Nope.
    Memo to Hawk: Wake up and smell the coffee, Hawk. The F-35A IOC is in late 2016, three years from now, but it won’t make it. General Bogdan, F-35 program manager, April 2013: “I see more risk to the delivery of Block 3F [software], our full warfighting capability, by 2017.” That’s delivery — it still would have to be tested. The F-35 system requires 24 million lines of software, ten million in the plane itself. Guess how many bugs there will be.
    That’s just one issue with the F-35 — there are others.

  • bobbymike34

    I like the quote of ‘family of systems’ for long range strike as it should include new ballistic and hypersonic missile systems.

  • FedUpWithWelfareStates

    “The other advantage of the F-35 is its commonality across the services. “We are already working on greater synergy among the air power services; with the F-35 and deploying common assets in a dispersed fleet, the efforts we are making now for today’s conditions will only lead to more effective capabilities for tomorrow’s crises as well.”

    Then why do we need 5 separate Air Forces?
    If going with “commonality across the services,” shouldn’t we only have one Air Force?

    • SolidBro

      Because they have different tasks and priorities. Navy aircraft must protect the fleet – antisub, fleet air interceptors, naval attack aircraft. Marines specialize in close-air support for their ground troops. The Air Force is mostly interested in air superiority and strategic bombers, with a low priority placed on tactical air (e.g., interdiction) and an extremely low priority on close-air support ops. In short, the tasks are different between protecting naval forces, pounding mud for ground troops, and defending land-based air bases and dropping nukes.

  • Gonzalo_Vergara

    The Japanese are the ones stirring up problems in Asia with claims over Chinese and Korean islands; moldy dreams of Japanese imperialism. We should stop coddling the Japanese and let them face China and the Koreans on their own.

    • Subotai

      Gonzalo, you’re insane. The Chinese barbarians are enemies to USA and a threat to ASEAN. It is USA duty to humanity to check them. Real Americans applaud enlisting Japan.

      • Gonzalo_Vergara

        Real Americans know that japan sucks… they are the dirtbags of Asia