NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg receives official letters of application to join NATO from Klaus Korhonen (ambassador of Finland accredited to NATO) and Axel Wernhoff (ambassador of Sweden accredited to NATO). (NATO)
WASHINGTON — After almost a year of positioning themselves as a package deal, it appears Sweden and Finland may be splitting up in order to ensure the latter’s acceptance into the NATO alliance.
All NATO nations except Turkey and Hungary have voted to ratify Swedish and Finnish membership. Hungary has indicated it will hold a vote in the near future, but Turkish President Recep Erdoğan has steadfastly refused to back off his opposition to Swedish membership. Ankara views Stockholm as too soft on what Turkey calls terrorist organizations, including ethnic Kurds who are living inside Swedish borders.
Erdoğan has for months noted that Finland has done what it needed to do for his approval, but until now both Stockholm and Helsinki have resisted the idea of breaking up the joint bid. The two nations have spent the post-World War II era as militarily neutral nations, but Russia’s invasion of Ukraine pushed them to finally make the move to join NATO.
That dam seems to burst Wednesday when Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson made public comments effectively blessing Finland getting into NATO without Sweden by its side, saying “it’s not out of the question that Sweden and Finland will be ratified in different stages,” according to the AP.
“We don’t hide at all that we preferred to be ratified together, to make the whole journey hand in hand,” Kristersson was quoted as saying. But “I’ve always also expressed the fact that every … country in NATO makes their own ratification decisions and we have full respect for that.”
Shortly afterwards, Finnish president Sauli Niinistö announced he would be traveling to Turkey on Thursday to meet with Erdoğan and indicated he expected to receive acceptance from Turkey for Finland’s NATO bid. Erdoğan himself made public comments indicating he is hoping to move forward with Finland’s membership.
The importance of looming May elections in Turkey cannot be understated in this process. Erdoğan is trying to rally nationalist fervor in support of his third term in office. Stirring up emotions against Sweden — especially after a notable incident where an activist burned a Quran outside of Turkey’s embassy in Sweden — seems to be part of that strategy. What is unknown is if Erdoğan will relax his opposition to Sweden after the election concludes.
NATO leaders both in Washington and Brussels have been trying to pressure Erdoğan to cave on the NATO membership issue for both Finland and Sweden, with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg saying during a February visit to Ankara that “now is the time” for the move to happen.
How could Sweden and Finland impact NATO as members? Read more:
- Finland, Sweden in NATO ‘opens up a lot of possibilities’
- Norwegian air chief wants ‘Nordic Air Operations Center’ if Sweden, Finland join NATO
- Danish defense minister: New status quo will ‘move NATO to the north,’ with Baltic emphasis
- Finland needs ability to ‘react rapidly’ to any Russian aggression: Minister
- What Finland will bring to NATO – and how it might change the alliance
- NATO expansion should be accompanied by a Nordic defense reset
Capability exists to simulate the future of kill chains at theater scale
A tool to explore what-if scenarios and tradeoffs at the theater-level faster than traditional analysis.
Top defense insights from 2024
A curated look at standout opinions and analysis covering topics like uncrewed systems, NATO partnerships, US-Saudi defense dynamics, and evolving warfare strategies, spotlighting key issues shaping the global defense landscape.
